Throughout France's political issues of 1814-1815, Cousin chose the royalist side and embraced the views of this doctrinaire party, where Royer-Collard was the philosophical pioneer. He appears to have gone farther and approached the intense negativity. The Normal School was hauled away, and Cousin shared with the destiny of Guizot, who had been ejected from the seat of history. This enforced abandonment of people instruction was a mixed blessing; he put out to Germany to further his philosophical research. In Berlin, in 1824-1825, he had been thrown into prison, either on a ill-defined political charge in the insistence of the French authorities, or as a consequence of an indiscreet conversation. Freed following six months, he stayed under the feeling of the French authorities for three decades. This was the time during which he created what is distinctive from his philosophical philosophy. His eclecticism, his ontology along with his philosophy of history have been announced in principle and in the majority of their salient details from the Fragments philosophiques (Paris, 1826). The preface to the next (1833) and the next variations (1838) aimed at a vindication of his principles contrary to modern criticism. The finest of his later novels, the Philosophie ecossaise, that the Du vrai, du beau, et du bien, along with the Philosophie de Locke, proved simply mature connections lectures given throughout the period from 1815 to 1820. The lectures on Locke were sketched in 1819, and entirely developed in the class of 1829.
The book of Fragments philosophiques (Paris, 1826) indicated the initial expansion of Cousin's standing as a philosopher. The job fused together the distinct philosophical influences that had shaped his own remarks.
Throughout the seven years after he had been prevented by teaching, he created, aside from the Fragments, the variant of the functions of Proclus (6 vols., 1820-1827), along with the functions of René Descartes (two vols., 1826).
Reinstatement in the university
In 1828, de Vatimesnil, ministry of public education in Martignac's ministry, remembered Cousin and Guizot for their professorial positions from the college. The three years that followed were the span of Cousin's greatest victory as a lecturer. His return into the seat was a sign of the victory of constitutional ideas and has been greeted with excitement. The hallway of this Sorbonne was packed since the hallway of no philosophical instructor in Paris was since the times of Pierre Abélard. Even the lecturer's eloquence mingled with insecure exposition, and he owned a singular energy of rhetorical orgasm. His doctrine showed the French intellectual tendency to generalize, and plausible need to set details about fundamental principles.
There was a spiritual elevation in Cousin's religious doctrine that inspired his listeners, also appeared to become a stronger foundation for its greater development in domestic literature and art, and even in politics, more compared to conventional doctrine of France. His lectures generated more disciples than people of some other modern professor of doctrine. Cousin occupies a leading place in the position of professors of philosophy, who enjoy Jacobi, Schelling and Dugald Stewart combined the presents of insecure, expository and creative power.
Influence
Cousin continued to lecture for two-and-a-half years following his return to the seat. Sympathizing with the revolution of July, he was at once understood by the new government for a pal of federal freedom. Composing in June 1833he clarified the eclecticism of his philosophical and his political stance:
I had the benefit of holding combined against me for several years both the magnificent and the theological college. In 1830, both colleges escalated into the arena of politics. The magnificent school quite naturally generated the demagogic celebration, along with the theological college became quite as inherently absolutism, secure to borrow from time to time the mask of this demagogue so the better to achieve its ends, as in doctrine it's by doubt that it undertakes to reestablish theocracy. On the flip side, he combated any exclusive rule in mathematics has been bound to reject additionally any exclusive principle from the nation, and to shield representative authorities.
The ministry of that his buddy Guizot was mind made him a part of the Council of Public Instruction and Counselor of State, and in 1832he had been made a peer of France. He stopped to lecture, but kept the name of professor of philosophy. He had been manager of the Regular School and virtual head of the college, and by 1840, a part of this Institute (Academy of Moral and Political Sciences). His personality and his official position gave him significant influence on the college and the instructional arrangements of France. Throughout the seventeen and a half a year of this reign of Louis Philippe, it had been mainly Cousin who formed the philosophical and the literary personalities of the cultivated course in France.
Impact on main schooling
The main task accomplished by Cousin in this period was that the organization of primary education in France. It had been to his attempts that France owed her progress in primary schooling between 1830 and 1848. Cousin believed that Prussia given the ideal case of an organized system of federal education; and in the summer of 1831, commissioned by the authorities, he visited Frankfort and Saxony, also spent some time at Berlin.
From the words of this Edinburgh Review (July 1833), these records"indicate an epoch in the development of federal education, and therefore are directly conducive to outcomes important not to France but also to Europe." The legislatures of both New Jersey and Massachusetts spread it at the colleges at government cost. Cousin commented that, one of all of the literary distinctions he had obtained,"none has touched me over the name of overseas member of the American Institute for Education." At the initial couple of decades of this reign of Louis Philippe, because of the enlightened views of the ministries of François Guizot and Adolphe Thiers and Cousin's organizational capability, more was performed for the instruction of these people than was accomplished in all of the history of France. Cousin talked before the Chamber of Peers, in 1844, in spite of their freedom of this analysis of philosophy at the college, opposing the clerical party on the 1 hand and the"leveling" or even Philistine celebration on another, each of which wanted to impose limitations on what might be educated. His addresses on this occasion were published within a tube, Défense p l'université et de la philosophie (1844 and 1845).
Read more about Political troubles
Comments